Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shane F's avatar

Some ideas around this:

1. It's easy to see the top line number when thinking about selling your house but the actual transaction is hell (Opendoor et al aside). In the Bay Area, expect to eat 5-6% in fees to your Realtor. You may have to eat transfer tax or city mandated repairs (sidewalks, sewer laterals) to the tune of $4-5k each. This is all before staging, marketing etc. plus the pain of movers and finding a short-term place to live while you look for your next house.

2. Property tax estimates on Zillow et al are comically off. They don't account for assessments that have been lobbied at the county level which can be a few thousand extra per year. Given the liberal electorate in the Bay Area, expect any insane tax with zero oversight on the ballot to pass, effectively increasing your property taxes ad infinitum.

On the buy side, it's even more screwed. We all know the sticker price on homes is effectively bullshit. So if the comps tell us roughly what it will go for, now you have 20 other buyers all jockeying to beat one another. Most homes with crazy bidding wars will not assess for anywhere remotely near what they sell for. Lenders will only give you a mortgage up to what a house will assess for. What does this mean for perspective buyers? You better have a lot more cash on hand to cover the spread between your 20% down payment and whatever you bid on your house, or better still, all cash.

Worse still, since most homes in the bay area are sold with non-contingent offers, your 3% earnest money deposit is on the line should you decide to back out of your insane offer. This puts you into a sticky spot. Either come up with the difference in cash, or pay the seller 3% of your offer for wasting their time, further eroding your stack.

The deck is pretty stacked against normal people transacting real estate given the immense friction involved.

The one point I found hard to swallow is, the nimby-ism. It is pretty entrenched in a lot of places, but upzoning is a clear win for property owners, particularly in the Bay Area. If the flats of Oakland got upzoned to 3 and 4 story walk-ups, it would massively increase density (think Brooklyn), have zero effect on the skyline, allow for a boon of ground-floor retail opportunity and give homeowners a chance to dump their homes to a developer at a substantial premium while likely improving affordability in the area writ large. In places like Berkeley though, I think this would be a tough pill to swallow because it makes too much sense. We probably need some legislation to change CEQA to take some tools out of the NIMBY tool belt before we'll see meaningful change here.

Expand full comment

No posts